Of Particular Significance

Blog – Of Particular Significance

Correction below — a couple of readers pointed out that I had read a misquote of what Rolf Heuer, director general of CERN, had actually said.  I’ve updated the post to reflect what he said and why he said it, though the main point of the post doesn’t change at all.

I’ve left the EuroPhysics conference … With 400 talks, and a hundred or so from the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider, it was information overload.

There are two more days of summary talks at the conference, and tomorrow (Wednesday) afternoon there will be a bit more on the Higgs particle search.  A combination of the DZero and CDF Tevatron results will be presented, and perhaps a preliminary combination of the ATLAS and CMS results at LHC.  [I won’t be there, so don’t look for the update as it happens…]  The combinations can be done roughly in your head by looking at the various experiments separately, so there should be no surprises.

The one thing I want to remind you, in case the press makes a big deal out of what is said on Wednesday, is that what has been done so far to obtain a hint of a Higgs signal involves a very difficult measurement.   [Soon I’ll write an explanation of what I mean by this, but for now you can read more about this here. ]  The experimentalists are well aware of that, and say so both in public and in private.   I believe I saw the director general of the CERN laboratory quoted as saying this will all be cleared up by the end of the year.  UPDATE: This was indeed what I saw, but what I saw was itself a misquote; Heuer actually said “it” will be cleared up by the end of next year.   Either statement is true, depending on what “it” is.

  • If “it” means finding or excluding the Standard Model Higgs particle (remember that’s not the most general Higgs particle, see the Higgs FAQ) then that may not be fully settled until late next year — though in saying “end of next year” Heuer is being suitably conservative.
  • If “it” means figuring out if the current hint of a Higgs particle signal is a mirage or something real, that is probably something that will start to be settled between this December and next June.

Either way, [and here we return to the original post]  notice what this also implies: this [meaning the current hints] will not be cleared up much before the end of the year.  Science requires patient work, especially when the methods are challenging and fraught with subtleties. (more…)

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON July 26, 2011

Taking advantage of our day and a half off from physics talks in Grenoble, I’ve written the answers to some questions that are often asked (or should be asked) about the Higgs particle.  I had planned to do a very careful job of explaining what the Higgs particle is all about — and eventually I will — but it seems as though doing something quick would be a good idea, given that the search for the Higgs particle has leapt into the news again and there’s a lot of interest in it right now.  So here you go; the Higgs FAQ.  I hope this is useful to you!

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON July 24, 2011

Two classes of interesting results this morning from the EuroPhysics conference.   I’ll try to explain their significance later when time permits. (more…)

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON July 23, 2011

A second video excerpt from my public talk “A Ring of Truth”, given last March, is now available.  I have put a link to it on the “Movie Clips” page.  This excerpt explains briefly why the Higgs is important (even to you), what the Higgs field does in nature, and how particle physicists make and detect rare particles.   [Things will be clearer if you watch excerpt 1 before watching excerpt 2.]

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON July 23, 2011

ATLAS reports that they have excluded Higgs with mass of 158-186 GeV but see an excess of between 2 and 3 standard deviations in the range 130-150 or so.

CMS reports exclusion of 150-183 but they see some excess in the same region of 130-150 or so, not quite as large, more like 1-2 standard deviations if my eyes do not deceive me.

This could be a badly modeled background, a statistical fluctuation, or the first sign of the Higgs particle.  More data needed.

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON July 22, 2011

Search

Buy The Book

Reading My Book?

Got a question? Ask it here.

Media Inquiries

For media inquiries, click here.