Tag: LHC

A couple of years ago I wrote a series of posts (see below) showing how anyone, with a little work, can verify the main facts about the Earth, Moon, Sun and planets. This kind of “Check-It-Yourself” astronomy isn’t necessary, of course, if you trust the scientists who write science textbooks. But it’s good to know you don’t have to trust them, because you can check it on your own, without special equipment.

The ability to “do it yourself” is what makes science, as a belief system, most robust than most other belief systems, past and present. It also explains why there aren’t widely used but competing scientific doctrines that fundamentally disagree about the basics of, say, the Sun and its planets. Although science, like religion, is captured in texts and teachings that have been around for generations, one doesn’t need to have faith in those books, at least when it comes to facts about how the world works nowadays. The books may be from the past, but most of what they describe can be independently verified now. In many cases, this can be done by ordinary people without special training, as long as they have some guidance as to how to do it. The purpose of the “Check-It-Yourself-Astronomy” series is to provide that guidance.

As I showed, nothing more than pre-university geometry, trigonometry, and algebra, along with some star-gazing and a distant friend or two, is required to

• confirm that the Earth’s a spinning (almost-)sphere,
• estimate the size of the Earth and Moon and the distance between them,
• show the Sun’s larger than the Earth and much further than the Moon, and that the stars are further still,
• verify the other planets orbit the Sun and estimate their relative distances from the Sun and their orbital times,
• infer a relation between these distances and times known as Kepler’s law, and show that a similar Kepler-type law works for objects orbiting the Earth,
• infer from these laws that the same gravity that makes ordinary objects fall does so by creating an inward acceleration, one that follows Newton’s inverse square law, holding certain objects in orbit around the Earth and others in orbit around the Sun
• confirm that the Earth orbits the Sun, by invoking Kepler’s law.
  • (Incidentally, this last statement is unambiguous, despite some claims to the contrary, even in Einstein’s theory of gravity.)

However this list is missing something important. From these methods, one can only obtain the ratios of planetary sizes to each other and to the Sun’s size, and the ratios of distances between planets and the Sun. Yet I did not explain how to measure the distance from the Earth to the Sun, or the distance from the Sun to any of the other planets, or the sizes of the other planets. It’s difficult to learn these things without sophisticated equipment and extremely precise measurements; the easiest things to measure about the planets and the Sun — their locations, motions and sizes — aren’t sufficient. (I’ll explain why they’re not sufficient in my next post.)

But shouldn’t there be a way around this problem?