Of Particular Significance

Blog – Of Particular Significance

Did you know that most of the information produced in the proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is dumped irretrievably in the metaphorical trash bin — sent ingloriously into oblivion — yes, discarded permanently — as quickly as it comes in? By “most,” I don’t mean 75%. I don’t mean 95%. I mean 99.999% to 99.9999% of all the data at the Large Hadron Collider is erased within a second of its being collected.

It sounds crazy; how can a scientific experiment simply ignore the vast majority of its data?! Well, it’s not as insane as if first appears. Nor is it unprecedented; previous generations of hadron colliders have done something similar. And finally, it is absolutely necessary. In this article I’ll tell you why.

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON November 4, 2011

Matt Strassler 11/1/11.   No rest for the weary: yet another discrepancy. This one is somewhat different from the small multi-lepton excess at CMS of a couple of weeks ago (tenuous, but in a very interesting and plausible place) and from the OPERA faster-than-light neutrino claim (not so tenuous, but not so plausible either). Now we have a discrepancy involving collisions that produce two low-energy photons [particles of light]. The effect is seen in four experiments, not one: both ATLAS and CMS at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and also CDF and DZero at the Tevatron collider. It’s too large to be a statistical fluke (the excess is not small and it shows up in four experiments). Nor does it look like an experimental mistake (since it shows up in four experiments). Might it be a sign of a new phenomenon not predicted by the Standard Model (the equations that describe the known particles and forces, plus the simplest possible Higgs particle)? Maybe… Can’t rule it out, though there’s not enough information in the experiments’ public documents for a serious evaluation of that possibility. But in any case, my preliminary impression is that it’s most likely something else: either a problem with the theoretical calculation of what the Standard Model predicts, or a problem with the way this theoretical calculation was used by the experiments.

Now why would I come to that conclusion? To read more, click here.

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON November 2, 2011

I’m hoping to focus this week on updating and improving some of the background articles on the website, rather than updating the latest news (unless something really crucial happens.)   I’ve just put up an improved version of my article on one of the most important aspects of the physics of the Large Hadron Collider, and indeed of any modern high-energy particle collider: jets, the experimental manifestation of high-energy quarks, anti-quarks, and gluons.  The article, which explains why a high-energy quark created in a particle collision is measured as a spray (or “jet”) of hadrons, now has figures and an accompanying text that should make it much clearer.  Comments welcome, as always.

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON October 31, 2011

Shoichi Sakata would have been 100 years old this year, and a conference celebrating his achievements in high-energy physics and beyond is underway here in Nagoya. The university president made brief introductory remarks, describing how, right after the war, Sakata introduced a democratically-inspired culture into the physics department, insisting on the right of young researchers to choose their own research paths independent of senior faculty, and permanently impacting the culture of physics (and beyond) at Nagoya University. There followed a talk reviewing Sakata’s most important work, including central contributions to the understanding of the muon, many of the hadrons, and the first two neutrinos. Unfortunately for Sakata, English publication of one of his most important papers (correctly identifying the muon as a decay product of an electrically-charged pion) was delayed by the war; another of his ideas (concerning the nature of hadrons) inspired many important developments, but was not itself correct; and a third idea (suggesting two neutrinos, which could oscillate one into the other) arrived just a bit too late to predict an experimental result. On top of this, he died young, before he was 60.   Consequently, outside Japan he is not so widely known today.  But here he casts a long shadow. Indeed, Professor Maskawa’s brief address at the opening of the Inaugural Conference of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute (earlier this week) was entirely devoted to lauding his mentor.

Professor Fumihiko Sakata, standing in front of his father's memorial stone, thanks the assembled dignitaries (including, from left, Nagoya University president Hamaguchi and Nobel Prize winners Maskawa and Kobayashi.)

Tucked in among today’s talks, another ceremony, this one to unveil a memorial stone outside the Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, in Sakata’s honor.

Unfortunately I cannot stay for the last day of the conference. An amusing feature of my journey home: I depart Tokyo at 5 pm on October 28th and arrive in New York City at 5 pm on October 28th.

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON October 27, 2011

The Nagoya (Japan) conference in celebration of the Inauguration of the Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute has come to a close this morning.  There was a pleasant little ceremony yesterday in which Kobayashi and Maskawa took up shovels to place dirt around a newly-planted tiny apple tree outside the institute — an apple tree descended directly from “Newton’s apple tree” at Trinity College, Cambridge (you know the one, the tree whose apple is said to have inspired Newton’s theory of gravity — as though he’d never seen a dropped fork before.)

Professors Kobayashi (right) and Maskawa await the shovels they will use to place dirt around the roots of the newly-planted descendant of Newton's apple tree.

Meanwhile, back indoors there were numerous talks on a wide variety of research topics. Several of these addressed Japan’s broad experimental particle physics program, which covers neutrinos, bottom quarks, dark matter, cosmic rays, and the development of new experimental devices.  Here are a few tidbits I heard about yesterday.

First, the one you all want to know: there was some very good news from the OPERA experiment (the one with the speedy neutrinos,) in which Nagoya is a participant.   (more…)

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON October 26, 2011

I’ve already mentioned in some earlier posts that the international nature of high-energy physics is one of its great pleasures.  And occasionally the opportunity for travel arises in the context more of celebration than of pure work. In 2008, Professors Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa won the Nobel Prize, (sharing it with Yoichiro Nambu, who was awarded for a separate topic.) The award was for work they did together  in 1973 predicting [more or less] the existence of the “third generation” of quarks (the top and bottom quarks — the first two generations being (1) the up and down and (2) the charm and strange quarks.)   (You can read about the known quarks here.)  (more…)

Picture of POSTED BY Matt Strassler

POSTED BY Matt Strassler

ON October 25, 2011

Search

Buy The Book

Reading My Book?

Got a question? Ask it here.

Media Inquiries

For media inquiries, click here.